Final answer:
The statement is false; alphabetical ordering is a common convention in English writing for bibliographies, but not a universal standard across all professional fields. Other strategies can be used depending on the context, and in writing, the canonical order is a principle rather than an absolute rule.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is false that ordering authors alphabetically is a universally accepted strategy in professional fields. While it is a common convention in many English writing contexts, particularly in creating reference lists and bibliographies, it is not the only method used across all professional fields. There are instances where other ordering systems are used, such as in medicine or law, where citations might be ordered by relevance or date rather than alphabetically.
When alphabetizing authors in a bibliography or reference list, it's important to alphabetize the entries according to authors' last names, and if necessary, by the initials of their first and middle names. If there are works with more than one author or unknown authors, the typical guidelines suggest using et al. for multiple authors, or for unknown authors, starting with the first significant word of the title, ignoring articles like 'a,' 'an,' or 'the'. The entire page should be double-spaced.
In writing, the canonical order of sentence elements is a preferred strategy, but writers are encouraged to use different structures when it adds clarity or emphasis to their text. The key to effective writing is understanding and appropriately applying these strategies to reflect clear and graceful prose.