184k views
4 votes
Christopher is writing an argument to convince his audience that sending people to the moon again is not a good plan for the United States. What is the strongest claim he can use in the argument?

A. Sending more people to the moon is not fair to the majority of Americans because not everyone will be able to afford to go.

B. While studying the moon up close would certainly be interesting, it is not wise to invest money on something other than. Earth.

C. The expense of sending people to the moon is simply not worth the effort that will be required to return to that far-off dot in the sky.

D. The excessive cost of creating a new mission to the moon diverts funding from projects that would have more benefit to the public.

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

it is not a good idea

Step-by-step explanation:

because sending people to the moon it won't be an easy job they will need fuel for the machines.

User Mastid
by
7.5k points
3 votes

Answer: D. The excessive cost of creating a new mission to the moon diverts funding from projects that would have more benefit to the public is the strongest claim Christopher can use in the argument.

Explanation: This claim highlights the opportunity cost of investing in a moon mission, which could have been used for other projects that have a more significant benefit to the public. It also suggests that the resources invested in a moon mission could be better used for other initiatives, such as education, healthcare, or infrastructure.

User Latrece
by
7.5k points

No related questions found