Final answer:
Cafe owners should consider the prisoner's dilemma in game theory and recognize the inelastic demand of coffee when deciding whether to maintain a pricing agreement. Defecting may lead to immediate gains but long-term destabilization and lower profits for all. Cooperation and differentiation can provide sustainable long-term profits.
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering the scenario of cafes near campus raising the price of coffee, the owners should evaluate the situation within the framework of game theory and market dynamics influenced by supply and demand. Each cafe faces a strategic decision, similar to the prisoner's dilemma, where they can either cooperate and maintain higher prices for mutual benefit or defect and lower prices in hopes of attracting more customers short-term but risk destabilizing the market agreement.
In the context of elasticities of demand, coffee tends to have an inelastic demand, meaning consumers have less sensitivity to price changes. Thus, small declines in price may not lead to significantly higher quantities consumed, as evidenced by an elasticity of 0.3 for coffee demand. However, if a cafe lowers its price, the disequilibrium created may lead to notable customer migration to the lower-priced option, undermining the collective pricing strategy.
Therefore, the most sustainable long-term strategy for maintaining profits may involve sticking to the agreed higher price while also focusing on differentiating their products or services to add value to customers. Alternatively, engaging in a price war may lead to a detrimental race to the bottom, eroding profits for all cafes over time.