120k views
3 votes
(Please, I need help starting this and it's due tomorrow!!!)

Write an essay to discuss this assertion: "Science has done more harm than good." Support your ideas with solid argumentation nurtured by instances from history, or the history of sciences, sciences or general knowledge, scientists,
quotations, books written by scientists, artists, philosophers, thinkers, social analysts, or scholars, etc... in general.

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

Put this through a plagiarism Fixer, and fix it up, you can check for plagiarism using Grammarly, make sure to read through it and edit it to your liking.

Step-by-step explanation:

The assertion that "science has done more harm than good" is a complex one, and its validity depends on various factors. While it is true that science has played a significant role in some of the world's most destructive events, such as the development of nuclear weapons or the use of pesticides that harm the environment, it is also important to consider the many positive contributions that science has made to society.

One of the most significant areas where science has done more harm than good is the development of nuclear weapons. The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 caused massive destruction and loss of life, and the ongoing arms race between nations with nuclear capabilities continues to pose a threat to global security. The physicist and Nobel laureate Albert Einstein himself famously lamented the role he played in the development of nuclear weapons, stating that "I made one great mistake in my life – when I signed the letter to President Roosevelt recommending that atom bombs be made."

Another area where science has caused harm is in the use of pesticides and other chemicals in agriculture. While these substances can increase crop yields and help feed a growing population, they also have negative impacts on the environment, including soil and water pollution, harm to non-targeted species, and the development of resistant pests. As the writer and environmental activist Rachel Carson noted in her book "Silent Spring," the indiscriminate use of pesticides poses a significant threat to the natural world and human health.

However, it is also important to consider the many positive contributions that science has made to society. Medical advances, for example, have saved countless lives and improved public health. The development of vaccines and antibiotics has reduced the spread of infectious diseases, while advances in surgical techniques and medical technology have made it possible to treat and cure previously untreatable conditions. The biologist and physician Paul Ehrlich, for example, developed the first effective treatment for syphilis, a disease that had previously been incurable.

Science has also led to significant improvements in technology and industry, improving standards of living and quality of life for people around the world. The development of the internet, for example, has revolutionized communication and information sharing, while advances in transportation and manufacturing have made goods and services more accessible and affordable.

In conclusion, while it is true that science has played a role in some of the world's most destructive events, it has also made significant contributions to society in the form of medical advances, technological improvements, and increased understanding of the natural world. It is important to continue to critically examine the impact of science on society and to work towards minimizing its negative effects while maximizing its positive contributions. As the physicist and philosopher Freeman Dyson once wrote, "Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge." It is up to us to use that thinking in a responsible and ethical way, and to harness the power of science for the betterment of humanity.

User David Chen
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.