133k views
1 vote
A) Does Shakespeare's lack of originality matter? (Minimum 100 words).

B) Is the Renaissance a great shift in time and thought or not? Explain (minimum 100 words).
C) Utilizing one artist discuss how perspective appears in the piece. Compare to at least one work of art that does not have perspective (minimum 100 words)

User Moosli
by
9.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer: There is much controversy regarding Shakespeare's alleged lack of creativity. Although some may argue that Shakespeare's creations are not completely unique, as he frequently utilized plots and characters from other origins. On the other hand, some contend that Shakespeare's brilliance did not stem from his innovation but rather from his skill in rejuvenating pre-existing tales, giving rise to personas and circumstances that remain current and impactful even in the present day. In the end, whether or not Shakespeare's supposed lack of creativity is significant remains subjective. The fact that Shakespeare's works continue to captivate a wide audience proves that their timeless value and significance transcends their source of origin.

The Renaissance is a greatly significant era in human history, seen as a crucial turning point in both temporal and intellectual terms. The Renaissance was marked by a resurgence in the study of classical knowledge, an emphasis on humanistic values and independent thinking, and an abundance of creative and intellectual output. Even in the present day, we can sense the influence of the Renaissance, since numerous concepts and principles introduced at that time persistently impact our society. Interpretation plays a crucial role in determining whether the Renaissance constituted a significant shift in both time and ideology. Undoubtedly, the Renaissance was characterized by an immense surge of originality and inventiveness, the consequences of which cannot be understated in shaping the direction of human history.

An illustration of perspective in art is visible in the distinguished artwork of Leonardo da Vinci, specifically in the Mona Lisa painting. The artwork stands out due to its implementation of linear perspective, which produces the impression of depth and dimensionality on a flat plane. Da Vinci utilized this method to produce a perception of volume and distance within the artwork, inducing the observer to experience the sensation of inhabiting the same space as the depicted individual. On the other hand, a piece of art that omits perspective could be exemplified by a Byzantine icon that showcases a flat, two-dimensional approach that dismisses the implementation of perspective. The Byzantine icons achieve a unique sense of spirituality and otherworldliness by eliminating the depth cues and flattening the image, distinguishing them from the more realistic, three-dimensional approach of Renaissance art.

Step-by-step explanation:

User John Safranek
by
8.3k points