Answer: Genetically modified (GM) or genetically engineered (GE) crops refer to plants which have undergone genetic modification through biotechnology techniques. The aforementioned method encompasses the exchanging of genetic material between organisms, often of dissimilar taxonomic lineages, in a concerted effort to develop advantageous traits or attributes in the agricultural yield. The contention surrounding genetically modified (GM) foods revolves around the perceived advantages with respect to augmented yields, pest resistance, and superior nutritional quality versus the possible risks imposed on human health and the environment. This essay presents a discourse against the adoption of genetically modified (GM) foods and substantiates this stance with factual data.
A prominent apprehension surrounding genetically-modified (GM) foods pertains to the potential health hazards they may impose to human consumers. Although the scientific community has not arrived at a definitive consensus regarding the matter, certain research works have posited a potential association between GM foods and various health concerns such as allergies, antibiotic resistance, and cancer. An investigation presented in the International Journal of Biological Sciences demonstrated that the consumption of Genetically Modified (GM) maize by rats led to a remarkable increase in the incidence of tumors and organ impairment compared to those rats fed non-GM maize. A recent investigation conducted by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health consisting of 19 studies has demonstrated that consumption of genetically modified (GM) soy led to a variety of detrimental effects in mice, including alterations in blood composition as well as diminished liver and kidney function.
Furthermore, in conjunction with the plausible health hazards, genetically modified (GM) foods carry the prospect of exerting adverse effects on the environment. A prevailing concern of great import pertains to the likelihood of genetic contamination, which entails the hybridization of genetically modified (GM) crops with non-GM or wild crops, thus yielding fortuitous outcomes. An empirical investigation undertaken by the University of Arkansas revealed that genetically modified (GM) rice interbred with wild rice, leading to the dissemination of the GM genes and engendering the formation of unintended attributes. The subject matter discussed holds the possibility of bearing significant implications including the emergence of superweeds or the depletion of genetic variability.
An additional apprehension associated with genetically modified (GM) crops is their potential to prompt a surge in the application of pesticides and herbicides. Genetically modified (GM) crops, though engineered to withstand pests and diseases, may potentially result in amplified employment of chemical agents, as pests and diseases develop resistance to the GM crops. Consequently, such a phenomenon could potentially yield adverse repercussions on the natural surroundings and well-being of individuals.
To summarize, biotech agricultural products possess certain advantages, such as augmented crop production and pest resilience; however, their implementation presents plausible hazards to both the well-being of humanity and ecological systems. In light of the ambiguities surrounding the enduring consequences of genetically modified (GM) foods, it is pertinent to exercise prudence and conscientiously contemplate the plausible hazards prior to adopting this innovation. Sustainability-focused and organic farming practices, which prioritize the enrichment of biodiversity and safeguard human well-being and the natural surroundings, ought to be accorded priority.
Step-by-step explanation: