Question

Lorne is charged with assaulting his brother with a deadly weapon. There is no dispute about his identity. The main issue for trial is whether or not he intended to cause serious harm to his brother. The prosecutor wants to introduce a video taken of Lorne at his brother's wedding, three years earlier. Lorne, in a brunken rage, lunged at his brother with a steak knife, screaming that he would *ill him. Since the weapon in this case is also a knife, the prosecutor feels the video shows that Lorne has murderous intent toward his brother and uses knives as weapons.

Would the video evidence be helpful to proving the case?

Answer 1

since there is evidence that people can control all of their body when dr unk this case should not escalate into a full blow trial the is not a proven fact that when dr Unk you have no control this is a rather a simple matter of a family feud

the video would not be help full

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

this isnt enough evedince as someone who is d runk cant control all of there body functionss, when d runk someone can do/say things they wouldnt normally say or do.

Step-by-step explanation: