Final answer:
A contract that requires an action against public policy is indeed illegal and unenforceable because it contravenes the fundamental tenet of legality in an agreement. It undermines property rights and fails to provide legal recourse for enforcement, thus violating legal standards and economic stability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement posed in the question is false. A contract that calls for an action that is contrary to public policy is typically considered illegal and therefore unenforceable. Contracts that involve illegal activities breach not only the basis of contractual agreements but also public policy, which is established to uphold the law and ethics within society.
Legal principles dictate that a contract must have lawful objectives; otherwise, the agreement is void. This foundational tenet is fundamental in the legal system to ensure transactions align with societal norms and legal standards, which are in place to support economic stability and fairness. Ultimately, an illegal contract violates property rights and lacks the legitimate recourse through legal systems to address noncompliance or enforce terms.