137k views
1 vote
Explain Why 387 is not a term of the sequence

User Israfel
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

In order to determine whether 387 is a term of a sequence, we need to know the rule or formula for generating the sequence. Without this information, it is not possible to determine whether 387 is a term of the sequence or not.

If we assume that the sequence is an arithmetic sequence, where each term is obtained by adding a fixed constant to the previous term, we can use the following formula to determine whether 387 is a term of the sequence:

an = a1 + (n-1)d

where a1 is the first term of the sequence, d is the common difference between consecutive terms, and n is the term we are trying to find.

If we substitute the values for the first few terms of the sequence, we can check whether 387 is a term or not. For example, if the first few terms of the sequence are:

a1 = 3

a2 = 8

a3 = 13

a4 = 18

and so on, with a common difference of 5 between consecutive terms, we can use the formula to find the value of the 129th term of the sequence:

a129 = a1 + (129-1)d

a129 = 3 + 128(5)

a129 = 643

Since 387 is not equal to 643, it is not a term of this sequence. However, without knowing the rule or formula for generating the sequence, it is impossible to say for certain whether 387 is a term or not.

User Jonathan Allard
by
8.6k points

No related questions found