178k views
2 votes
PLease HELP 99 points Tribute to the Dog

by George Graham Vest
George Graham Vest (1830¬–1904) was an attorney and U.S. Senator who was known as one of the greatest public speakers and debaters of his time.. This speech is Graham’s closing argument in a case in which he represented a man who was suing another man for killing his dog. Graham’s impactful statement helped to win the case.
Gentlemen of the Jury: The best friend a man has in the world may turn against him and become his enemy. His son or daughter that he has reared with loving care may prove ungrateful. Those who are nearest and dearest to us, those whom we trust with our happiness and our good name may become traitors to their faith. The money that a man has, he may lose. It flies away from him, perhaps when he needs it most. A man's reputation may be sacrificed in a moment of ill-considered action. The people who are prone to fall on their knees to do us honor when success is with us, may be the first to throw the stone of malice when failure settles its cloud upon our heads.
The one absolutely unselfish friend that man can have in this selfish world, the one that never deserts him, the one that never proves ungrateful or treacherous is his dog. A man's dog stands by him in prosperity and in poverty, in health and in sickness. He will sleep on the cold ground, where the wintry winds blow and the snow drives fiercely, if only he may be near his master's side. He will kiss the hand that has no food to offer. He will lick the wounds and sores that come in encounters with the roughness of the world. He guards the sleep of his pauper master as if he were a prince. When all other friends desert, he remains. When riches take wings, and reputation falls to pieces, he is as constant in his love as the sun in its journey through the heavens.
If fortune drives the master forth, an outcast in the world, friendless and homeless, the faithful dog asks no higher privilege than that of accompanying him, to guard him against danger, to fight against his enemies. And when the last scene of all comes, and death takes his master in its embrace and his body is laid away in the cold ground, no matter if all other friends pursue their way, there by the graveside will the noble dog be found, his head between his paws, his eyes sad, but open in alert watchfulness, faithful and true even in death...................................................................
Why do you think Graham’s statement was so “impactful?” Make sure to include evidence to support your opinion. Your answer should be one paragraph (6-8 sentences).

User Qed
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

George Graham Vest's statement in defense of a man's dog was impactful because it appealed to the emotions of the jurors and the public. By contrasting the fickleness of human relationships with the unwavering loyalty of a dog, he created a powerful and relatable image that resonated with the jury. The use of vivid and evocative language, such as describing the dog sleeping on the cold ground and guarding its master even in death, helped to further strengthen the emotional impact of the statement. Additionally, the statement was delivered at the end of the trial, which allowed it to leave a lasting impression on the jurors as they deliberated on the case. As a result, the statement helped to win the case and has since become a memorable and iconic piece of American legal history.

User FDG
by
7.9k points
2 votes

Answer:

Reword if needed

Graham's statement was impactful because he appealed to the emotions and values of the jury, emphasizing the unique loyalty and devotion that a dog shows to its owner. He contrasted the fickleness and potential disloyalty of human relationships with the unwavering loyalty of a dog. This argument likely resonated with the jury and tapped into their sense of empathy and compassion. Additionally, Graham's eloquent language and vivid imagery helped to paint a powerful picture of the bond between a man and his dog. Overall, Graham's statement was a compelling argument that successfully convinced the jury of the importance of a dog's life and the responsibility that humans have in protecting and respecting that life.

User Rumit Patel
by
8.1k points