Answer:
Freelance journalism and traditional journalism have their own set of risks and challenges. However, traditional journalism has some advantages over freelance journalism that can help overcome certain risks.
One of the main risks of freelance journalism is the lack of stability and financial security. Freelancers are not salaried employees and are not guaranteed a steady stream of income. In contrast, traditional journalists usually work for established media organizations and receive a salary and benefits. This provides a greater degree of financial security.
Another risk of freelance journalism is the potential for isolation and lack of support. Freelancers often work alone, without the resources and support of a newsroom. In contrast, traditional journalists work in a newsroom environment where they have access to colleagues, editors, and other resources. This can help provide a sense of community and support.
Finally, freelance journalism also carries the risk of legal issues and lawsuits. Freelancers may not have the legal resources and protection of a news organization. Traditional journalists, on the other hand, work for established media organizations that have the resources and expertise to navigate legal issues.
Overall, while freelance journalism has its own advantages, traditional journalism can offer greater stability, support, and legal protection for journalists.