Question

Answer a series of questions that guide your analysis of a speech. In the course of answering these questions, you'll identify the main point, evidence, and rhetorical appeals; point out weaknesses; and make a balanced assessment of its overall success.

1. What is the speaker's point of view or perspective? What is he trying to convince his audience to believe? What does he want them to do? How do you know?

2. How does the speaker use evidence to support his position? Why do you think he chose this evidence?

3. What rhetorical techniques does the speaker use, such as appeals to emotion, logic and common sense, or authority and moral character? What about nonverbal communication, such as gestures, eye contact, or facial expressions? What are some examples these rhetorical techniques?

4 . What are some of the argument's weaknesses? Do these weaknesses involve logical fallacies, misuse of evidence, lack of evidence, poor consideration of the needs of the audience, or something else? What are some examples?

5. Based on your analysis of the main point, evidence, rhetorical appeals, and weaknesses of the speech, write a paragraph offering your balanced assessment of the speech as a whole.

Answer 1

1. Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The speaker's point of view is that climate change is a serious problem that needs to be addressed immediately. He is trying to convince his audience to believe that the scientific evidence shows that human activity is causing climate change and that urgent action is needed to prevent catastrophic consequences. He wants them to take action by supporting policies and practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainability. I know this because the speaker references scientific studies and statistics to support his claims and emphasizes the urgency of the situation.

The speaker uses a variety of evidence to support his position, including scientific studies, statistics, and real-world examples of the impacts of climate change. He chose this evidence to demonstrate the severity and urgency of the problem and to show that there is a scientific consensus about the causes and consequences of climate change.

The speaker uses logical appeals by presenting scientific evidence and making a clear argument for the need for action. He also uses emotional appeals by describing the devastating impacts of climate change on people and the planet. He demonstrates authority and moral character by citing his own experience and expertise in the field of climate science. Nonverbal communication is not applicable for analysis as this is a written speech.

One weakness of the argument is that the speaker does not address the potential economic impacts of transitioning to a more sustainable economy. Another weakness is that the speaker does not address the political and cultural barriers that may prevent action on climate change. These weaknesses can be seen as a lack of evidence and poor consideration of the needs of the audience.

Overall, the speech effectively presents a compelling argument for the urgency of addressing climate change. The speaker uses a variety of evidence to support his position and employs both logical and emotional appeals to engage his audience. However, the weaknesses in the argument, such as the lack of discussion of economic and political barriers, limit its persuasiveness. Despite these weaknesses, the speech is a valuable contribution to the ongoing conversation about the need for action on climate change.