105k views
5 votes
Make or Buy Eggers Company needs 22,000 units of a part to use in producing one of its products. If Eggers buys the part from McMillan Company for $100 instead of making it, Eggers will not use the released facilities in another manufacturing activity. Forty percent of the fixed overhead will continue irrespective of CEO Donald Mickey’s decision. The cost data are

Cost to make the part:
Direct materials $32
Direct labor 13
Variable overhead 21
Fixed overhead 40
$106
Required:
Determine which alternative is more attractive to Eggers and by what amount.

User IQAndreas
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

Eggers Company needs to determine whether it is more cost-effective to make the part in-house or to buy it from McMillan Company. To do this, we need to compare the total cost of each alternative.

If Eggers makes the part in-house, the total cost will be the sum of the direct materials, direct labor, variable overhead, and fixed overhead costs. Since Eggers needs 22,000 units of the part and 40% of the fixed overhead will continue irrespective of the decision, the total cost of making the part in-house can be calculated as follows:

Total cost to make = (Direct materials + Direct labor + Variable overhead + Fixed overhead) * Quantity Total cost to make = ($32 + $13 + $21 + ($40 * 0.4)) * 22,000 Total cost to make = $2,145,600

If Eggers buys the part from McMillan Company for $100 per unit, the total cost will be the price per unit multiplied by the quantity needed:

Total cost to buy = Price * Quantity Total cost to buy = $100 * 22,000 Total cost to buy = $2,200,000

Comparing these two values, we can see that it is more attractive for Eggers to make the part in-house rather than buying it from McMillan Company. The difference in cost between these two alternatives is $2,200,000 - $2,145,600 = $54,400.

So, Eggers can save $54,400 by making the part in-house instead of buying it from McMillan Company.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Bharat Modi
by
7.9k points