Final answer:
The policy of free SHS has sparked a debate on its impact and effectiveness. Advocates for and against the motion present strong arguments using examples and evidence to support their stance.
Step-by-step explanation:
The topic of the question is the policy of free SHS (Free Senior High School) and its impact. The student asks for a debate for or against the motion that the policy has done more harm than good.
To debate the motion, one could argue that the policy of free SHS has led to overcrowding in schools, insufficient resources, and lowered academic standards. Additionally, it may be argued that the policy does not address the diverse needs of students and fails to provide quality education. Examples and evidence can be used to support these points and make a convincing argument.
To debate against the motion, one could argue that the policy of free SHS has increased access to education, reduced the financial burden on families, and improved enrollment rates. It may be mentioned that the policy has helped students from disadvantaged backgrounds to receive an education and has positive long-term effects on the country's development. Again, providing examples and evidence can strengthen the argument.