Question

Should states have the autonomy to decide whether they teach about CRT or is this topic so important/central to the principles of justice in the U.S. that states should not have a choice in the matter and it should be mandated curriculum by the Federal Government, similar to Math and English?

Is CRT too divisive, and does it sensationalize the ideas and importance of race in our society such that any benefit that may be derived from its use is outweighed by the harm it causes to students?

Answer 1

CRT is a topic that is central to the principles of justice in the United States, and it is important for students to understand the role that race has played in shaping our society and institutions. Therefore, it could be argued that CRT should be mandated as part of the curriculum by the federal government, similar to math and English.

As for the second question, the use of CRT in the classroom can be controversial, and some people believe that it is too divisive and sensationalizes the importance of race in our society. However, it is important to recognize that racism and its effects are real, and it is crucial for students to understand the ways in which race has influenced history and society. While there may be some harm caused by discussing difficult and uncomfortable topics, the benefits of teaching CRT far outweigh the potential harm, as it can help students become more informed and empathetic citizens.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate regarding CRT, it is ultimately important for students to have a comprehensive understanding of race and its impact on society. Therefore, it may be necessary for the federal government to mandate the teaching of CRT in schools, while also ensuring that it is taught in a way that promotes empathy, understanding, and critical thinking.

Step-by-step explanation: