Final answer:
Based on the observation of a -10 Pgy storage rate, the researcher can conclude that the oceanic nutrient pool size is decreasing and that a change must be occurring in other Earth's subsystems due to the interconnected nature of biogeochemical cycles.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a researcher has determined that the storage rate of a particular nutrient in the oceanic subsystem is -10 Pgy (petagrams per year), she can conclude that the oceanic nutrient pool size is decreasing. This negative storage rate indicates that the nutrient is being removed from the oceanic reservoir faster than it is being replenished. Additionally, because Earth's global biogeochemical cycles are interconnected, this implies that the size of this nutrient's pools in one or more of Earth's other subsystems (besides the ocean) must also be changing. If a nutrient is depleting in one reservoir, it must be accumulating in another, or it might be involved in a faster cycling between components of the biosphere.
Due to the interconnected nature of biogeochemical cycles, nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur amongst others, flow through oceans, atmosphere, terrestrial environments, and biological organisms, continually cycling between these pools. The alteration in one part of the cycle will invariably impact other parts. Hence, understanding these cycles and how human activities have impacted them is crucial for maintaining the balance of ecosystems and preventing potential consequences for Earth.