14.4k views
3 votes
Since the US was geographically far away from the fighting:

A. The US did not want to produce many weapons
B. Troops were less effective fighting on new territory
C. European countries stopped buying from the US, wanting to support each other
D. Trade with other nations increased as the US could sell many supplies

User Lory
by
7.7k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

D. Trade with other nations increased as the US could sell many supplies

Step-by-step explanation:

This question might be referring to WWI, which lasted from 1914 to 1918 and involved most of the countries of Europe and their colonies, as well as other nations such as Russia, Japan, and the Ottoman Empire. The United States remained neutral for most of the war, until it joined the Allied Powers in 1917. During its neutrality, the United States benefited from its geographic isolation from the fighting, which allowed it to trade with both sides of the conflict and supply them with food, raw materials, and weapons. The United States also increased its industrial production and economic growth as a result of the war demand. Therefore, option D is the best answer, as it describes how the US took advantage of its distance from the war and increased its trade with other nations. The other options are incorrect because:

Option A is false because the US did want to produce many weapons, both for its own defense and for selling to its allies.

Option B is irrelevant because it does not describe how the US was affected by its geographic location during its neutrality.

Option C is false because European countries did not stop buying from the US, but rather increased their imports from the US to meet their war needs

User Dmarin
by
7.1k points
4 votes

Answer:

D: Trade with other nations increased as the US could sell many supplies.

If fighting is going on, such as a war, it increases the economy because states may need certain supplies they cannot get at the moment.

User Pkachhia
by
8.1k points

No related questions found