Final answer:
The cylindrical shell, having a greater moment of inertia than a solid disk of the same mass and radius, converts less kinetic energy into rotational energy and more into potential energy, allowing it to reach a greater maximum height on the incline.
Step-by-step explanation:
Comparing Maximum Heights of Rolling Objects
When considering two objects rolling up a slope without slipping, such as a cylindrical shell and a solid disk, the amount of rotational inertia plays a significant role in determining which reaches a greater maximum height. Rotational inertia, or the moment of inertia, depends not only on the mass of the object but also on how the mass is distributed relative to the axis of rotation. A hollow cylinder has a greater moment of inertia than a solid disk of equal mass and radius because more of its mass is distributed farther from the centre. This means that assuming equal initial kinetic energy, the solid disk will convert more of its kinetic energy into rotational energy, leaving less energy to be converted into potential energy as it ascends the slope.
Therefore, the cylindrical shell, with its greater moment of inertia, would convert less of its kinetic energy into rotational energy and more into gravitational potential energy, allowing it to ascend to a greater maximum height on the incline than the solid disk. It's essential to note that the question assumes no energy losses due to factors like air resistance or friction apart from what's necessary to prevent slipping. No additional information about mass and diameter is needed because they are stated to be the same for both objects.