136k views
5 votes
Sample argument essay.

Develop an argument as to whether democratic or authoritarian regimes are better at maintaining political stability.
Use one or more of the following course concepts in your response.

Civil society
Civil liberties
Political socialization

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

The issue of which form of government, democratic or authoritarian, is better at maintaining political stability has been debated for decades. Some people argue that authoritarian regimes are more effective at maintaining stability because they can use force to suppress dissent, while others believe that democratic governments are better because they provide more civil liberties and allow for a more active civil society. In this essay, I will argue that democratic regimes are ultimately better at maintaining political stability because they foster a more robust civil society, provide greater civil liberties, and promote political socialization.

Firstly, democratic regimes are better at maintaining political stability because they foster a more robust civil society. Civil society refers to the network of organizations and individuals that exist outside of the government and work to promote the common good. In a democratic society, civil society plays a critical role in maintaining political stability by providing a space for citizens to express their views and organize for change. By contrast, in an authoritarian regime, civil society is often weak or non-existent, leaving citizens with few opportunities to participate in the political process. This lack of civil society can lead to increased political instability, as citizens who are dissatisfied with the government have no outlet to express their grievances.

Secondly, democratic regimes are better at maintaining political stability because they provide greater civil liberties. Civil liberties are the freedoms that individuals have to pursue their own interests without interference from the government. In a democratic society, these civil liberties are enshrined in law and protected by the courts, giving citizens a sense of security and stability. By contrast, in an authoritarian regime, civil liberties are often curtailed, leading to increased political instability as citizens feel oppressed and powerless.

Finally, democratic regimes are better at maintaining political stability because they promote political socialization. Political socialization refers to the process by which individuals acquire political attitudes and values. In a democratic society, political socialization is facilitated through a variety of channels, including schools, the media, and social networks. By contrast, in an authoritarian regime, political socialization is often limited to state-controlled media and propaganda, which can lead to a lack of political engagement and increased political instability.

In conclusion, while authoritarian regimes may appear to be more effective at maintaining political stability in the short term, in the long term, democratic regimes are ultimately better at maintaining stability because they foster a more robust civil society, provide greater civil liberties, and promote political socialization. In order to promote political stability, therefore, it is essential that governments around the world embrace democratic principles and work to create a society in which citizens have a voice and a stake in the political process.

User Tom Nolan
by
8.2k points