Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The resistance of Algeria to French rule and East Africa's resistance to German rule differed in several significant ways:
Historical Context: The historical context of Algeria's resistance to French rule and East Africa's resistance to German rule was different. Algeria had been under French rule since 1830, and the resistance movement started in the 1950s. In contrast, Germany began colonizing East Africa in the late 19th century, and the resistance movement started in the early 1900s.
Resistance tactics: The resistance tactics used in Algeria were more violent and aimed at guerrilla warfare. The National Liberation Front (FLN) used bombings and assassinations to fight against French rule. In contrast, the resistance movements in East Africa were more focused on traditional warfare tactics, such as ambushes and raids.
Leadership: The leadership of the resistance movements was also different. In Algeria, the FLN was a centralized organization with clear leadership, while in East Africa, the resistance movements were more fragmented and lacked a centralized leadership structure.
Objectives: The objectives of the resistance movements were also different. The FLN in Algeria aimed for full independence from France, while the resistance movements in East Africa sought greater autonomy within the German colonial system.
International support: The international support for the resistance movements was also different. Algeria's resistance movement received support from several countries, including China, the Soviet Union, and Cuba. In contrast, the resistance movements in East Africa received little international support.
Overall, while both Algeria and East Africa resisted foreign colonial rule, the differences in historical context, resistance tactics, leadership, objectives, and international support resulted in different outcomes and experiences for these two regions.