Answer: Argumentative papers are more effective when they are biased in facts rather than emotion or discrediting because facts are objective and can be verified, while emotions and discrediting are subjective and may not be convincing to everyone. When you use factual evidence to support your argument, you provide clear and concise information that can be easily understood and evaluated by the reader. This helps to build credibility and trust with your audience, which is essential for persuading them to accept your argument.
Explanation: In contrast, using emotional appeals can be less effective because emotions are subjective and can vary from person to person. Some readers may be moved by emotional appeals, while others may be skeptical or put off by them. Similarly, discrediting your opponents may not be convincing to everyone, as it can come across as aggressive or disrespectful, and it may not address the key issues at hand.
Therefore, argumentative papers are more effective when they are biased in facts because they provide a solid foundation for your argument and help to establish your credibility with the reader. This makes it more likely that your argument will be accepted and that you will be able to persuade your audience to take action or adopt your point of view.