189 views
2 votes
Please answer question 1, and two more questions. Your

total word count should be about 250 words total (not
per question). Be specific in your answers. They should
demonstrate that you've read (closely) and thought
about the texts.
1. According to Chapter 6 of ACF, what is the
Modified Freytag Pyramid?
2. According to Chapter 8 of ACF, what is wrong with
ending your story by revealing that your main
character is really a dog?
3. What surprised you about Percival Everett's story
-either something about the content, or about
how it was told?
4. What technique in this story would you want to try
in your own story?
5. What question about the story would you ask the
author if you could? Why do you want to know?

User Gundon
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. In Chapter 6 of ACF, the Modified Freytag Pyramid is a variation of the traditional plot structure. It is a visual representation of a story's plot that is divided into seven parts: exposition, rising action, complication, climax, reversal, falling action, and resolution. The Modified Freytag Pyramid is distinguished from the traditional plot structure by the addition of the complication stage. In this stage, the main character faces an obstacle or challenge that creates tension and suspense in the story. The complication stage is followed by the climax, reversal, and falling action stages, which build to the resolution.

2. Chapter 8 of ACF argues that ending a story by revealing that the main character is really a dog is problematic because it violates the reader's expectations of the story. Readers expect characters to be human or to possess human-like qualities. By revealing that the main character is a dog, the story disrupts the reader's understanding of the character's motivations and actions. Additionally, this type of ending can come across as gimmicky or contrived, as if the author was more interested in shocking the reader than in creating a satisfying story.

3. What surprised me about Percival Everett's story was the way in which the author played with language and form. The story, "The Appropriation of Cultures," is told through a series of fragmented vignettes that are connected thematically but not necessarily chronologically. The story also includes a variety of narrative voices and styles, including a first-person narrator, a third-person narrator, and a screenplay. This experimental approach to storytelling was unexpected and made the story feel fresh and innovative.

4. The technique in "The Appropriation of Cultures" that I would want to try in my own story is the use of multiple narrative voices and styles. By experimenting with different narrative techniques, I could create a more dynamic and engaging story that keeps readers interested and invested.

5. If I could ask Percival Everett a question about "The Appropriation of Cultures," I would ask about his inspiration for the story's fragmented structure. I would want to know how he decided to structure the story in this way and what effect he was trying to achieve. Understanding the author's intentions would give me a deeper appreciation for the story and help me to think more critically about my own writing.

User Cheese Bread
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.