Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Here are three well-developed paragraphs that address the questions in your assignment:
There were several reasons why the atomic bomb should have been used on Japan during World War II. One reason was that it ultimately saved lives. After the conclusion of the European front in March 1945, Allied forces began turning their attention to Japan. The military minds of these countries put together a plan that was called Operation Downfall. One of the most significant issues in planning this invasion was that the landing locations for an invasion where highly predictable. Japanese forces came to the same conclusions as the Allied planners, so they began to reinforce their key structure points. An all-out defense of Kyushu was planned, with casualty predictions on both sides expected to be very high. Although the final estimates would vary based on the assessment of the individuals involved, one such document created for the Secretary of War’s staff placed the number at up to 800,000 Allied fatalities, with an additional 10 million Japanese fatalities. Despite the high number of casualties from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, without the need for Operation Downfall, the actual number of deaths became much lower than anticipated.
On the other hand, there were several reasons against using the atomic bomb on Japan. Some historians argue that it was not necessary because Japan was essentially defeated and seeking surrender. Others argue that it was inhumane due to its destructive nature and its ability to kill many innocent people, including children. Additionally, some historians argue that it was used more to scare the Soviet Union than to defeat Japan.
Ultimately, whether or not the atomic bomb should have been used on Japan is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. It’s up to each individual to weigh these arguments and come to their own conclusion based on their own values and beliefs. Some may argue that the potential saving of lives through avoiding Operation Downfall justified its use, while others may argue that its destructive nature and impact on innocent civilians made its use unjustifiable.
Received message. Here are three well-developed paragraphs that address the questions in your assignment: 1. There were several reasons why the atomic bomb should have been used on Japan during World War II. One reason was that it ultimately saved lives. After the conclusion of the European front in March 1945, Allied forces began turning their attention to Japan. The military minds of these countries put together a plan that was called Operation Downfall. One of the most significant issues in planning this invasion was that the landing locations for an invasion where highly predictable. Japanese forces came to the same conclusions as the Allied planners, so they began to reinforce their key structure points. An all-out defense of Kyushu was planned, with casualty predictions on both sides expected to be very high. Although the final estimates would vary based on the assessment of the individuals involved, one such document created for the Secretary of War’s staff placed the number at up to 800,000 Allied fatalities, with an additional 10 million Japanese fatalities. Despite the high number of casualties from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, without the need for Operation Downfall, the actual number of deaths became much lower than anticipated. 2. On the other hand, there were several reasons against using the atomic bomb on Japan. Some historians argue that it was not necessary because Japan was essentially defeated and seeking surrender. Others argue that it was inhumane due to its destructive nature and its ability to kill many innocent people, including children. Additionally, some historians argue that it was used more to scare the Soviet Union than to defeat Japan. 3. Ultimately, whether or not the atomic bomb should have been used on Japan is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. It's up to each individual to weigh these arguments and come to their own conclusion based on their own values and beliefs. Some may argue that the potential saving of lives through avoiding Operation Downfall justified its use, while others may argue that its destructive nature and impact on innocent civilians made its use unjustifiable.