87.3k views
3 votes
ms.urbanski kept a pistol in her home as protection against intruders. one evening she heard a noise in the den and went to investigate. upon entering the room she saw a man stealing her television. the bugular seeing the gun ran for the window but ms. urbanski fired and killed hime before he could escape. in a trial for manslaughter ms urbanski pleaded self-defense. would you find her guilty? why or why not? would it matter if the state had a stand your ground law

1 Answer

2 votes
In general, the outcome of a trial would depend on the specific circumstances of the case, including the laws of the state where the incident occurred.

In some states, individuals have the right to use deadly force in order to protect themselves or their property from imminent harm. This is known as the "castle doctrine" or "stand your ground" law. In states with these laws, it may be easier for Ms. Urbanski to claim self-defense.

However, even in states with these laws, the use of deadly force must be reasonable and proportional to the threat faced. If Ms. Urbanski's actions were found to be excessive, she could still be found guilty of manslaughter.

Ultimately, the case would be decided by a judge and/or a jury based on the evidence presented and the specific laws of the state where the incident occurred.
User Ridd
by
7.2k points