Answer:
However, based on the titles you provided, I can provide a general explanation of how each magazine might support their arguments.
TIME Magazine may support its argument by providing evidence to show that the three common arguments for preserving the Electoral College are flawed or misguided. They may use examples from past elections, historical data, and expert analysis to support their claims.
Real Clear Politics may argue that the Electoral College is necessary to protect the interests of smaller states and rural areas. They may use data and statistics to show how the Electoral College helps to balance the power of voters in less populated states against those in more densely populated states.
PBS NewsHour may support the proposal for a popular vote to determine the winner by highlighting the flaws and limitations of the current Electoral College system. They may provide examples of how the current system has failed to reflect the will of the people and how a popular vote could provide a more accurate representation of the voters' preferences. They may also provide expert opinions and analysis to support their argument.
Step-by-step explanation: