33.8k views
3 votes
People interested in reducing their impact on the environment have started driving electric cars instead of conventional cars. They do so because electric cars use less gas. As such, the switch is viewed as a way to limit the environmental impact. Some argue that the this is not the case. The environmental impact of mining cobalt, which is used in the batteries of electric cars, offsets the reduced amount of gas. As such, the environmental impact of electric cars may actually be less in the long run. nd highways. Car drivers in those cities are protesting those plans. They believe that cyclists should not be allowed to ride on the roads for a number of reasons. Arguments against the plan include, for example, that tax money used to maintain the roads are only paid for by car owners. Therefore, only car owners should be able to use the roads. Others argue that allowing cars and bicycles on the same road would result in a lot of accidents because cyclists do not follow the laws such as stopping at stop signs. In addition, allowing bicycles on the roads will increase traffic as they can’t go as fast as cars. Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the above argument?

1 Answer

4 votes
can you give the choices as well
User ZKK
by
8.4k points

No related questions found