The question of whether the correct side won between the Greeks and Persians is a matter of perspective and interpretation. From the Greek perspective, they were fighting for their freedom and sovereignty against a foreign invader. They saw themselves as defending their way of life and their values against an imperial aggressor. From the Persian perspective, they were expanding their empire and extending their influence over new territories. They saw themselves as bringing civilization and order to the barbarian Greeks.
In the end, the Greeks emerged victorious in the Greco-Persian Wars, thanks in part to their superior military tactics, leadership, and unity. The battles of Marathon, Thermopylae, Salamis, and Plataea are some of the most famous and decisive engagements of the conflict. The Greeks were able to repel the Persian armies and navy, and eventually push them back to Asia Minor.
Some historians argue that the victory of the Greeks was not only due to their military prowess, but also to their cultural achievements and democratic ideals. The Greeks were known for their philosophy, literature, art, and architecture, which inspired later generations and shaped Western civilization. The Greeks also had a system of government that allowed for participation and representation from citizens, which contrasted with the autocratic rule of the Persian kings.
Thus, from a historical perspective, one can argue that the Greeks represented the right side of the conflict, as they defended their freedom, culture, and democracy against a foreign power. However, it is important to note that history is always open to interpretation and revision, and different people may have different opinions on the matter.
Regarding Charles Sumner and his support in Massachusetts, the answer is more straightforward. Charles Sumner was a prominent abolitionist and senator from Massachusetts during the mid-19th century. He was known for his passionate speeches and writings against slavery, and his advocacy for civil rights and equality for all.
Sumner's views and actions often put him at odds with other politicians and groups, particularly in the South. In 1856, Sumner gave a speech in which he criticized the pro-slavery forces in Kansas and insulted a senator from South Carolina, Andrew Butler. This led to a violent attack against Sumner by a congressman from South Carolina, Preston Brooks, who beat Sumner with a cane on the Senate floor.
The incident caused outrage and condemnation across the country, with many people rallying around Sumner as a symbol of anti-slavery and free speech. In Massachusetts, Sumner's supporters organized rallies and meetings in his honor, and he received thousands of letters of support and sympathy.
Thus, it is safe to say that Charles Sumner had a significant level of support in Massachusetts, particularly among the anti-slavery and abolitionist movements. His courage and determination in the face of violence and opposition made him a hero for many people, and his legacy as a champion of human rights and justice continues to inspire people today.