Final answer:
Paragraphs 21-25 are examined to understand their contribution to the article's ideas about migrant workers, assessing whether they discuss migrant exclusion, feelings of being unheard, potential enhancement of democratic systems, or reflect on American compassion. The distinction between foreign and domestic migrant workers is important to grasp differences in economic and legal conditions for migrants.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine how paragraphs 21-25 contribute to the development of ideas in the article from COMMONLIT Excerpt from The Harvest Gypsies, we should infer the overall message that these paragraphs convey regarding migrant workers. If the paragraphs emphasize the problematic nature of migrants' low status in a democratic society and how their exclusion from community life poses issues for democracy, option A would be correct. However, if the focus is on migrant workers leaving communities where they feel unheard or disrespected, then option B is more likely the central idea. Option C is correct if these paragraphs suggest that the presence of migrant workers is likely to enhance democratic systems where they are employed. Lastly, option D would be appropriate if the paragraphs argue that the treatment of migrant workers exposes a lack of compassion among the American public.
The distinction drawn between migrant farm workers coming from foreign countries and those from within the United States is crucial to understanding the nuances of migrant labor. If foreign migrants are discouraged or have to leave after a certain time, compared to internal migrants who are welcomed or can stay indefinitely, this highlights different economic and legal conditions affecting these groups of workers. The author could also be making comparisons based on the resources with which foreign versus domestic migrants arrive, their reasons for migrating, or the permanence of their stay in the work environments.