Answer:
In "The Charge of the Light Brigade," the speaker is a third-person narrator who describes the soldiers charging into battle. The speaker's tone is objective and detached, and the focus is on the bravery and sacrifice of the soldiers. The speaker uses vivid language to create a sense of the chaos and danger of the battle, such as "Cannon to right of them, / Cannon to left of them, / Cannon in front of them / Volleyed and thundered." The effect of the speaker's objective tone is to create a sense of awe at the soldiers' courage and a sense of tragedy at the waste of human life. The poem emphasizes the power of duty and the importance of sacrifice for one's country.
In contrast, "The Battle of Blenheim" has a first-person speaker, who is a child listening to an old man's story about a battle. The speaker's tone is curious and innocent, and the focus is on the absurdity and pointlessness of war. The speaker uses simple language to convey the horror of war, such as "But what good came of it at last? / Quoth little Peterkin. / Why that I cannot tell, said he, / But 'twas a famous victory." The effect of the speaker's innocent tone is to highlight the foolishness of war and the way that it is often glorified despite its terrible costs. The poem emphasizes the need for people to question the wisdom of those in power and to resist the lure of glory and conquest.
In summary, while both "The Charge of the Light Brigade" and "The Battle of Blenheim" deal with war, they have different speakers and tones. "The Charge of the Light Brigade" has an objective, third-person speaker who emphasizes the bravery and sacrifice of soldiers, while "The Battle of Blenheim" has an innocent, first-person speaker who questions the wisdom and value of war. These different approaches to war result in different effects on the reader, with the former emphasizing the power of duty and sacrifice, and the latter emphasizing the need for critical thinking and resistance to the lure of war.