Answer:
Malcolm X was a prominent civil rights leader in the United States in the 1960s and was known for his advocacy of Black nationalism and his critique of white supremacy. Malcolm X viewed violence and justice as two different things and had a complex relationship with both.
On the one hand, Malcolm X recognized that violence could be a legitimate tool for achieving justice in certain circumstances. He argued that oppressed people had a right to defend themselves by any means necessary, including through violent resistance, if peaceful means of protest were not effective in achieving their goals. He famously stated, "I don't call it violence when it's self-defense, I call it intelligence."
On the other hand, Malcolm X also recognized that violence could be counterproductive and could ultimately undermine the cause of justice. He believed that violence should only be used as a last resort, and that peaceful means of achieving justice were always preferable. He also acknowledged that violence could be used as a tool of oppression and that it was important to distinguish between violence used by the oppressed in self-defense and violence used by the oppressor to maintain power and control.
Overall, Malcolm X saw violence and justice as two distinct concepts that were sometimes related but not necessarily the same. He believed that the use of violence to achieve justice should always be carefully considered and that nonviolent means of protest should always be explored before resorting to violence.