Question

What is mapp v ohio case about

Answer 1

Mapp v. Ohio was a 1961 Supreme Court case establishing that evidence obtained through illegal searches under the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state courts, strengthening the exclusionary rule.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Mapp v. Ohio case is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that advanced the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, as laid out in the Fourth Amendment. In this 1961 case, evidence obtained from an illegal search of Dollree Mapp's home was deemed inadmissible in state court. This case reinforced the exclusionary rule, an essential component of search and seizure laws, ensuring that evidence collected unlawfully cannot be used in court against a defendant. The ruling emphasized the importance of constitutional protections and bolstered the privacy rights of individuals against governmental intrusion.

Answer 2

Mapp v. Ohio was a landmark case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits
"unreasonable searches and seizures," is inadmissible in state courts . The case extended the exclusionary rule, which was then being applied to the federal courts, to the state courts. The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures applies to the states and excludes unconstitutionally obtained evidence from use in state criminal prosecutions. The decision overruled Wolf v. Colorado, which had held that the exclusionary rule did not apply to the states.