Question

In 2016, Germany ran the first successful test of a fusion reactor. Shortly after, China also ran a successful test. Imagine that the US begins talks on developing nuclear fusion to begin replacing fossil fuels and nuclear fission reactors as an energy source. Do you think this is a good idea? What would be the pros and cons?

Your response should be 3-5 sentences long

Answer 1

Developing nuclear fusion as an energy source could be a good idea because it has the potential to provide a virtually limitless supply of clean energy with few emissions. Unlike nuclear fission, nuclear fusion does not produce long-lasting radioactive waste, which could reduce the risks associated with nuclear energy. However, developing nuclear fusion is a complex and expensive process, and it may take decades to develop commercially viable technology. Additionally, there are concerns about nuclear proliferation and the potential for accidents or disasters, so careful safety and security measures would be necessary.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

In nuclear fusion, two light atoms, in this example hydrogen, are fused together at extremely high temperatures to generate helium. This process is similar to that which fuels our Sun naturally.

The technique would generate massive amounts of clean energy from a seemingly limitless fuel supply with virtually no carbon emissions. However, it hasn't been done on a scale that would make it workable. Canadian scientists intend to change that by providing a working nuclear fusion plant prototype by 2030 by harnessing and developing nuclear fusion technology.

The benefits of nuclear fusion are:

It has fair cost competition.

It generates a lot of energy density.

It creates less pollution.

It can be sustainable.

Cons of Nuclear Fusion are:

It is extremely difficult to achieve.

It produces radioactive waste.

More research and brainpower is needed to solve its issues.

Its practical energy returns are still quite unreachable.

Step-by-step explanation: