Final answer:
The cases involve violations of internal control principles such as segregation of duties, establishing responsibilities, physical controls, independent internal verification, and protecting assets. Each action by employees showcases a different principle being overlooked or ignored, thereby increasing the risk of errors or fraud within the company.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the problem provided, there are several cases where internal control principles are violated:
- a. Chi Han’s case violates the internal control principle of segregation of duties. Since she receives all incoming cash receipts and posts the customer payments to their respective accounts, there is no separation between the custody of assets and the accounting for assets, which increases the risk of errors or fraud.
- b. At Tico Company, the issue with Julia and Trevor alternating as petty cash custodians violates the principle of establishing responsibilities. There should be a single person responsible for the petty cash to maintain control and minimize the potential for misuse of funds.
- c. Nori Nozumi’s practice at the Hopeville Medical Clinic violates the physical control principle. By not password locking her computer and the accounting system, she fails to protect records from unauthorized access and potential tampering.
- d. Ben Shales neglects the principle of independent internal verification. By not conducting reviews of his employees’ work, there is no verification process to catch potential errors or misconduct.
- e. Carta Farah’s actions at her plant violate the principle of protecting assets through insurance and bonding. By raising the insurance deductible and foregoing bonding, the company is exposed to higher risks of loss which might not be mitigated by the cost savings.