25.6k views
1 vote
Let U be a finite, nonempty set and let P(U) be the power set of U. That is, P(U) is the set of all subsets of U. Define the relation ~ on P(U) as follows: For A, B P(U), A B if and only if A B = That is, the ordered pair (A, B) is in the relation ~ if and only if A and Bare disjoint. Is the relation an equivalence relation on P(U)? If not, is it reflexive, symmetric, or transitive? Justify all conclusions.

User Hollabaloo
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The relation ~ on P(U) is not an equivalence relation as it is not reflexive. However, it is symmetric and transitive because sets that are disjoint from each other maintain this property in ordered pairings.

Step-by-step explanation:

When considering the power set P(U) of a set U, the relation ~ is defined such that for A, B in P(U), A ~ B if and only if A and B are disjoint. To be an equivalence relation, a relation must be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. However, relation ~ is not reflexive because no set can be disjoint with itself, hence an ordered pair (A, A) cannot be in the relation. It is symmetric because if A is disjoint from B, then B is also disjoint from A. Lastly, it is transitive; if A is disjoint from B and B is disjoint from C, then A must be disjoint from C. Therefore, the relation is symmetric and transitive but not an equivalence relation.

User Payam Shakibafar
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories