116k views
1 vote
David's neighbors trusted him and gave him the key to their shed so that he

could store the wood they get delivered to their doorstep while they are away.
During this time, some burglars break into the locked shed and steal all of the
wood. When the neighbors return, David explains to them that it isn't his fault.
Which of the following best explains why he is correct?
A. He did not lock the shed because he thought it would be OK
B. He is not responsible for damages because reasonable care was
given
C. He can't afford to pay for the damages although it was his fault
D. He benefits from the shed as well, so he should not be liable

User Abey
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

B. He is not responsible for damages because reasonable care was given.

Step-by-step explanation:

As shown in the details, he was specifically given a key to unlock and lock the shed for the delivery of wood. The details also state that the burglars broke into a locked shed. This means that he locked the shed behind him, and therefore is not at fault.

Further proof is that the burglars also caused damage when breaking in, which meant they did not have access to the key in order to open it. This also demonstrates that David was responsible in the care with the key.

Hope this helps!!

User Ankit Jaiswal
by
7.8k points