Question

Koenig suggests that with this new evidence there could be no way Hae was

murdered by 2:36pm. The State, however, based their entire case around this call.
Who do you think is most correct? Explain.

Answer 1

Koenig's argument that Hae could not have been murdered by 2:36 pm based on the new evidence is compelling. However, the State's case was not solely based on the 2:36 pm call. There was other evidence presented, such as Jay's testimony and cell phone records, that supported the State's case. It is possible that the State's timeline was off, but that does not necessarily mean that Adnan Syed is innocent. Ultimately, it is up to the court to determine the validity of the evidence and arguments presented by both sides.