234k views
2 votes
A Colorado baker refused to bake a cake for a homosexual wedding reception on the grounds that it violated his religious beliefs. He was found in violation of Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act but argues that being forced to create an expression (a cake in this instance) that goes against his religious beliefs is a violation of the 1st amendment’s free exercise clause. Therefore, the baker did not have to make the cake for the homosexual wedding because it went against his 1st Amendment rights.

Questions: So who is in the right? What do you think about this constitutional issue and what would you decide if you were on the Supreme Court?

User Gthmb
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer: I would agree with the Supreme Court

Step-by-step explanation:

I would agree with the Supreme Court because the baker cannot be forced to bake a cake for anyone; he gets to decide who he does business with.

User Yan Alperovych
by
8.2k points