Final answer:
Juveniles indeed have the right to not self-incriminate and must be informed of this right, which stems from the Fifth Amendment and has been confirmed by the Supreme Court, particularly in cases like Miranda v. Arizona and In re Gault.
Step-by-step explanation:
True: Juveniles do have the right to not self-incriminate and to be counseled on what self-incrimination is. This right is a critical component of the Fifth Amendment, which provides protection against self-incrimination. A landmark case that solidified these rights is Miranda v. Arizona (1966), which established that suspects must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have counsel present during interrogations to ensure any statements made are truly voluntary. This decision was later applied to juveniles through cases such as In re Gault (1967), extending due process protections under the Fourteenth Amendment to juvenile defendants.
Moreover, the Supreme Court has recognized that the practice of custodial interrogation is inherently coercive and has mandated that adequate procedural safeguards be in place to protect individuals from self-incrimination. This has been profoundly influential in shaping police interrogation tactics and ensuring the rights of suspects, juvenile or adult, are upheld.