Final answer:
Gallatin's appeals amplify his argument by leveraging emotions (pathos), credibility (ethos), and logic (logos) to persuade the audience. These appeals must be relevant, balanced, and support the main argument to be effective. The power of an argument is determined by the interplay and relevance of these rhetorical strategies.
Step-by-step explanation:
Gallatin's appeals contribute to the strength of his argument by harnessing rhetorical strategies that emotionally engage the audience, provide ethical consideration, and offer logical evidence. Rhetorical appeals commonly refer to ethos, pathos, and logos. By harnessing these in a balanced manner, Gallatin enhances the persuasiveness of his argument.
For example, when Gallatin makes an appeal to pathos by evoking feelings of pity or compassion, he is engaging the audience's emotions to build a connection with his point of view. However, this must be carefully balanced with ethos, or ethical appeals, which provide a sense of the speaker's credibility and character, and logos, the logical appeals that furnish concrete evidence and rational reasoning behind the argument.
Scrutinizing examples such as Gideon's reliance on the Constitution for his appeal, or Gomez's use of emotional and ethical appeals, gives insights into how these appeals function in crafting a compelling argument. It is important that these appeals are relevant and contribute to the main thesis or the central point of the argument. Garrison's inclusion of multiple texts, for instance, can be considered a logical appeal (logos) as it broadens the argument with external support. In sum, Gallatin's use of appeals should be evaluated for not just their presence but also for their effectiveness and relevance to his overall argument.