When Nelson begins by laying out the arguments against her central claim, she is using a rhetorical strategy that can enhance the appeal of her argument. This approach has several potential benefits:
1. stablishes credibility: By presenting opposing viewpoints, Nelson demonstrates her awareness of alternative perspectives and her willingness to engage with them. This openness can make her appear more objective and fair-minded, which can increase her credibility in the eyes of her audience.
2. Addresses counterarguments: By acknowledging counterarguments upfront, Nelson can address potential objections and dismantle them systematically. This proactive approach can make her own argument appear stronger, as it shows that she has considered and refuted the opposing side.
3. Engages the audience: Presenting opposing arguments can help engage the audience, as it invites them to consider multiple perspectives and to think critically about the issue at hand. This active engagement can make Nelson's own argument more persuasive, as it encourages the audience to weigh the evidence and come to their own conclusions.
4. Builds anticipation: By starting with counterarguments, Nelson creates a sense of anticipation, as the audience becomes curious about how she will defend her central claim. This can make her ultimate argument more compelling and memorable, as it fulfills the audience's expectations and provides a satisfying resolution to the debate.