be used to support Best's interpretation.
a) One major difference between Biles's and Best's historical interpretations of the New Deal is their evaluation of its overall effectiveness. Biles believes that the New Deal's economic policies were successful in preventing another depression and established a firm foundation for decades of economic growth. He also notes the positive impact of New Deal social programs, such as eliminating sweatshops and establishing a government safety net for the needy. On the other hand, Best acknowledges some positive contributions of the New Deal but criticizes its failure to fully recover from the depression during the eight years of Roosevelt's presidency. He also argues that the New Deal represented a form of government that was alien to liberalism, and historians need to assess its cost in human misery and reduced U.S. influence abroad.
b) One specific historical event or development during the period 1932 to 1950 that could support Biles's interpretation is the sustained economic growth in the United States after the New Deal. Despite some setbacks, the U.S. economy expanded steadily in the decades following the New Deal, with rising living standards and a growing middle class. This economic growth was supported by several New Deal policies, such as the creation of a minimum wage, Social Security, and other forms of government assistance that provided a safety net for vulnerable individuals and families.
c) One specific historical event or development during the period 1932 to 1950 that could support Best's interpretation is the prolonged economic downturn of the 1930s, which lasted for several years despite the implementation of the New Deal