To help Randy decide which job offer to take, we will compare the monthly and cumulative earnings for each company over time.
Company 1: Four for Fore, INC.
Starting Salary of $4000 with a monthly pay raise of $400
Month Monthly Earnings Cumulative Earnings
1 $4,000 $4,000
2 $4,400 $8,400
3 $4,800 $13,200
4 $5,200 $18,400
5 $5,600 $24,000
6 $6,000 $30,000
The monthly earnings for Four for Fore, INC. increase at a constant rate of $400 per month. The cumulative earnings increase at an increasing rate due to the constant increase in monthly earnings. The function used to model this plan is a linear function.
Company 2: Square Peg Corp.
Starting Salary of $100 the first month, with an increase of $400 in month 2, to $900 in month 3, $1600 in month 4, and so on
Month Monthly Earnings Cumulative Earnings
1 $100 $100
2 $500 $600
3 $900 $1,500
4 $1,600 $3,100
5 $2,500 $5,600
6 $4,400 $10,000
The monthly earnings for Square Peg Corp. increase at an increasing rate due to the increasing step size. The cumulative earnings increase at an increasing rate due to the increasing monthly earnings and step size. The function used to model this plan is an exponential function.
Company 3: DoubleMint Candy Co.
Starting Salary of $1 the first month, $2 the second month, $4 the third month, $8 the fourth month and so on.
Month Monthly Earnings Cumulative Earnings
1 $1 $1
2 $2 $3
3 $4 $7
4 $8 $15
5 $16 $31
6 $32 $63
The monthly earnings for DoubleMint Candy Co. increase at an increasing rate due to the doubling of the salary each month. The cumulative earnings increase at an increasing rate due to the exponential growth of monthly earnings. The function used to model this plan is an exponential function.
Based on the analysis above, we recommend that Randy take the job offer from Four for Fore, INC. This plan offers a steady and predictable increase in earnings, which makes it easier to plan for early retirement. The exponential growth in earnings of the other two plans could make it harder to plan for the future, as the monthly earnings are less predictable.