Question

The disadvantage in Naturalistic Observation is that there usually is more than

just one observer which may draw different conclusions from the same
witnessed behavior.

True
False

Answer 1

The statement is false, as multiple observers in naturalistic observation are not inherently a disadvantage but used to ensure consistency and combat observer bias.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is false. The disadvantage of naturalistic observation is not necessarily linked to the presence of multiple observers, but instead concerns the potential difficulties in setting up and controlling the environment, along with observer bias. Having multiple observers can indeed lead to different conclusions from the same witnessed behavior, which is why establishing clear criteria for recorded behaviors and ensuring inter-rater reliability is crucial. This ensures that observations are consistent and replicable among different researchers. However, the presence of multiple observers is often a means to counteract observer bias rather than a disadvantage.

Answer 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Naturalistic observation involves observing and recording behavior in its natural environment. One of the main disadvantages of this method is that different observers may interpret the behavior differently, leading to inconsistencies in the conclusions drawn from the observation.

The observer's personal biases, beliefs, and perspectives can influence how they interpret and analyze the behavior they observe. This can lead to differences in the observations made and the conclusions drawn. Therefore, it is important to ensure inter-observer reliability, which means that different observers should be able to agree on what they are seeing and how to categorize and describe it. This can be achieved through training and the use of clear and specific definitions of the behaviors being observed.