Step-by-step explanation:
I don't have personal opinions or biases. However, I can provide some objective observations about the two adaptations of Romeo and Juliet.
Both films have different styles and interpretations of the original story by William Shakespeare. The 1996 film directed by Baz Luhrmann was set in a modern-day Verona Beach, featuring contemporary music, fast-paced editing, and colorful visual effects. In contrast, the 2013 film directed by Carlo Carlei was a more traditional adaptation set in medieval Italy, with a more classic and romantic atmosphere.
One possible reason why some people might prefer the 1996 film is that it emphasizes the passion and intensity of the characters' emotions. The performances of Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes as the titular lovers were praised for their chemistry and energy, which made their tragic love story feel more relatable and poignant. Additionally, the film's use of modern imagery and language helped to bridge the gap between the 16th-century play and contemporary audiences, making it easier to engage with the story.
On the other hand, some viewers might prefer the 2013 film for its fidelity to the original source material. The film's screenplay by Julian Fellowes stayed closer to the play's dialogue and plot, which might appeal to fans of Shakespeare's writing. The film also featured a strong supporting cast, including Paul Giamatti as Friar Laurence and Damian Lewis as Lord Capulet, who added depth and nuance to their respective characters.
Ultimately, the question of which film is better at capturing the characters and conflict of Romeo and Juliet is a matter of personal preference. Some people might enjoy the modernized, high-energy approach of the 1996 film, while others might prefer the more classic and faithful adaptation of the 2013 film.