109k views
2 votes
Read "On Women's Right to Vote," a speech given by Susan B. Antony after she was arrested for voting in the 1872 presidential election. Then, respond to the question that follows.

Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.

The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:

"We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people -women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government—the ballot.

For any state to make sex a qualification that must ever result in the disfranchisement of one entire half of the people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post facto law, and is therefore a violation of the supreme law of the land.

By it the blessings of liberty are forever withheld from women and their female posterity.

To them this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household—which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion into every home of the nation.

Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.

The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities.

In a well-written paragraph of 5–7 sentences, explain the meaning and significance of the speaker's use of one rhetorical appeal and one rhetorical device from the list below. Use textual evidence from the speech to support your response.


Rhetorical appeals
ethos
logos
pathos

Rhetorical devices
figurative language
irony
rhetorical question

1 Answer

1 vote

Susan B. Anthony employs both ethos and rhetorical question in her speech. Ethos refers to the use of credibility and authority to persuade an audience. Anthony establishes her ethos by citing the Constitution and framing her argument in terms of the rights guaranteed to all citizens, rather than just women. She also draws on her personal experience of being arrested for voting to further establish her credibility on the topic of women's suffrage.

Anthony uses a rhetorical question to challenge the notion that women are not persons and therefore not entitled to the right to vote. She asks, "Are women persons?" and then proceeds to answer the question by asserting that as persons, women are citizens with the same privileges and immunities as men. This rhetorical question is significant because it forces the audience to confront the absurdity of denying women the right to vote based on their sex. By framing the issue in terms of citizenship and the Constitution, Anthony appeals to logos and establishes a rational argument for women's suffrage.

User NiLL
by
8.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.