Final answer:
McAfee's response to Autor's argument acknowledges past incorrect predictions about machines replacing human jobs, but also suggests that there is evidence indicating that this prediction might finally come true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that best characterizes McAfee's response to Autor's argument is: While previous predictions about computers replacing all jobs were incorrect, there's evidence this may finally come true.
Mcafee's response acknowledges that previous predictions about machines replacing human jobs were incorrect. However, he also suggests that there is evidence indicating that this prediction might finally come true. This implies that McAfee believes that the impact of technology on job displacement might be more significant than previously anticipated.