182k views
0 votes
Reasons why Alexander the Great’s legacy wasn’t good

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

Alexander the Great's legacy had negative aspects such as the mutiny and his death resulting from his march into India, decades of fighting among his generals after his death, and the decline of local influence and autonomy in the conquered lands.

Step-by-step explanation:

Alexander the Great's legacy was not entirely good for several reasons. First, his march into India was both a bold achievement and a mistake. While it showcased his military prowess, it also led to mutiny among his troops and ultimately resulted in his death. Secondly, after Alexander's death, his empire fell into decades of fighting as his generals vied for power, causing instability and conflict.

Another negative aspect of Alexander's legacy is the aftermath of his conquests. While he founded numerous cities that spread Greek culture, the local rulers and dynasties were not able to reestablish their rule over the conquered lands. Instead, Greek and Macedonian rulers took control, which resulted in a decline of local influence and autonomy.

Overall, while Alexander the Great was a military genius and inspirational leader, his legacy was marred by the repercussions of his campaigns and the instability they caused in his empire.

User Conner Ruhl
by
8.0k points
5 votes

Answer: his legacy was the end of Macedonian Empire that Philip and Alexander took so hard to build.

Explanation:

I don't have any, just remember it from last year...

User Jayelm
by
8.4k points

Related questions

asked Nov 18, 2017 184k views
Cwap asked Nov 18, 2017
by Cwap
8.6k points
1 answer
4 votes
184k views
asked May 23, 2018 22.8k views
Avani Bataviya asked May 23, 2018
by Avani Bataviya
7.4k points
1 answer
5 votes
22.8k views