Final answer:
Alexander the Great's legacy had negative aspects such as the mutiny and his death resulting from his march into India, decades of fighting among his generals after his death, and the decline of local influence and autonomy in the conquered lands.
Step-by-step explanation:
Alexander the Great's legacy was not entirely good for several reasons. First, his march into India was both a bold achievement and a mistake. While it showcased his military prowess, it also led to mutiny among his troops and ultimately resulted in his death. Secondly, after Alexander's death, his empire fell into decades of fighting as his generals vied for power, causing instability and conflict.
Another negative aspect of Alexander's legacy is the aftermath of his conquests. While he founded numerous cities that spread Greek culture, the local rulers and dynasties were not able to reestablish their rule over the conquered lands. Instead, Greek and Macedonian rulers took control, which resulted in a decline of local influence and autonomy.
Overall, while Alexander the Great was a military genius and inspirational leader, his legacy was marred by the repercussions of his campaigns and the instability they caused in his empire.