Step-by-step explanation:
Trading during the Roman times certainly had its benefits, but there were also some negatives associated with it. Some of the negatives of trading during the Roman times that you could consider for your debate are:
Disruption of local economies: When large quantities of foreign goods were introduced into local markets, it could disrupt the local economies. Local producers of goods could be put out of business due to competition from cheaper imported goods.
Dependence on foreign goods: As Rome expanded and trade networks grew, there was an increasing dependence on foreign goods. This could be a problem if the supply of these goods was disrupted or cut off due to political instability, war, or other factors.
Loss of traditional skills: The introduction of new foreign goods could also lead to a loss of traditional skills and knowledge. For example, as imported textiles became more popular, the demand for locally-produced textiles declined, leading to a loss of traditional weaving and spinning skills.
Inflation: As the Roman economy became more dependent on foreign goods, the cost of these goods could rise, leading to inflation. This could make it difficult for people on fixed incomes to afford basic necessities.
Spread of disease: As trade networks expanded, they also facilitated the spread of diseases. Roman armies and traders may have inadvertently introduced new diseases to local populations, leading to outbreaks of epidemics.
Environmental degradation: The production of goods and transportation of these goods over long distances could have negative environmental impacts. For example, deforestation and overfishing were common problems associated with Roman trade.
These are just a few examples of the negatives of trading during the Roman times. You could further research these topics and come up with more specific examples to support your arguments in the debate.