Answer:
QN 1
Rapid population growth and high fertility rates can have significant consequences for the Earth's ecology. Here are some of the potential impacts:
Habitat Destruction: As the human population grows, further land is needed for housing, agriculture and other mortal conditioning. This can lead to deforestation and destruction of natural territories, which can have a ripple effect on the ecosystem, including the extermination of factory and beast species
Pollution: the population grows, so does the demand for coffers, like energy, water, and food. The increased use of fossil energies and other natural resources can lead to air and water pollution, which can harm wildlife and ecosystems
Overconsumption: A growing population can lead to overconsumption of resources, which can contribute to unsustainable situations of consumption and waste generation. This can lead to a reduction of natural coffers, increased hothouse gas emigrations, and other environmental problems.
Climate Change: The increase in greenhouse gas emissions due to the growing population and high levels of consumption can contribute to climate change, which has a range of ecological impacts, including sea level rise, more frequent and severe natural disasters, and the loss of biodiversity.
Resource Depletion: The population grows require for resources increases, leading to depletion of non-renewable resources such as oil, natural gas and minerals. Overexploitation of renewable resources such as fisheries and forests can also lead to their reduction.
Deforestation: The population grows more land is needed for agriculture and urbanization, leading to deforestation. Deforestation can lead to soil erosion, loss of habitat for wildlife, and increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Therefore, quick population growth and high fertility rates can have foremost and broad consequences for the Earth's ecology. These impacts can affect not only the natural world but also human societies, including access to resources and the capability to sustainably support growing populations
QN 2
Malthusian theory of population, which was proposed by Thomas Malthus in the late 18th century, argues that population growth will eventually outstrip resources, leading to poverty, famine, and other problems. While Malthus's predictions have not come to pass in the exact way he envisioned, his theory is still relevant and valid today in several ways:
Limited resources: The world's resources are limited, and as the global population continues to grow, demand for these treasuries also increases. This can lead to resource reduction and environmental declination.
Population growth and food product Malthus argued that population growth would ultimately outshine food product, leading to shortage and starvation. While technological advances in agriculture have helped to increase food product, there are still enterprises about food security in numerous corridor of the world.
Economic inequality: Malthus also argued that population growth would complicate profitable inequality, as treasury would be concentrated among a small and wealthier segment of the population. Moment, income inequality remains a major issue in numerous countries, and population growth can complicate these inequalities.
Climate change: Malthus did not foresee the impact of industrialization on the environment, but his theory can still be applied to the issue of climate change. The global population's increasing demand for resources and energy is contributing to climate change, which in turn can have negative impacts on food production, resource availability, and human health.
Technological limitations: While technological advancements have enabled significant increases in food production and resource use, there are still limits to what technology can achieve. This suggests that the Malthusian argument of resource constraints still holds true.
Therefore, while Malthusian theory may not be applicable in its original form, its central idea that population growth can have negative impacts on resources, the economy, and the environment remains relevant today.