Question

HLP PLEASE ITS DUE ASAP ( Philosophy of Animals ) Only if you know how to answer if your in college

Be sure to include an introduction. An introduction should do the following:
o Introduce the reader to the topic. That is, explain in general terms
what the topic is, what the issue(s) is(are), and why the reader should care
about it.
o Introduce the reader to what will be done in the essay: explain briefly what will be the
different parts of the essay, that is, provide a roadmap
• Make sure the structure of your paper matches the roadmap provided in the introduction
• Cite all sources using both in-text citations and a works cited page.

What are the main features that distinguish anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric
positions?
- What are one or two characteristics (like, recognizing intrinsic value to all living beings
or recognizing intrinsic value only to sentient beings, having a principle of noninterference etc…) that you believe a non-anthropocentric position should rather not
have?
Specify, for each of these characteristics, which non-anthropocentric position seen in
class does include this feature and why you believe it is a problematic one. Include
reference to the author and publication presenting/discussing this position.
- What are one or two characteristics (like, recognizing intrinsic value to all living beings
or recognizing intrinsic value only to sentient beings, having a principle of noninterference etc…) that you believe a non-anthropocentric position should have?
Specify, for each of these characteristics, which non-anthropocentric position seen in
class already does include this feature and why you believe it is a valuable one. Include
reference to the author and publication presenting/discussing this position.
- How do you apply your position, made of the rejection or endorsement of the features
discussed in your essay, with respect to other forms of life to everyday life?

Answer 1

Introduction:

Understanding the moral and religious ramifications of interactions between humans and non-human animals is the focus of the field of animal philosophy. This area of study has important implication for how society views and treats animals. In this essay, we will discuss the main traits that separate objectivist and non-anthropocentric positions. We'll also look at the characteristics a non-anthropocentric perspective should or shouldn't have, as well as how these positions relate to real-world situations.

Anthropocentric vs. Non-Anthropocentric Positions:

Whereas non-anthropocentric perspectives recognize the intrinsic value of non-human animals and/or the environment, anthropocentric positions see humans as the only beings with intrinsic value. The complete rejection of any use of animals by humans is one aspect that a non-anthropocentric viewpoint should not contain. The animal rights perspective, which believes that all uses of animals are evil, is a good example of this viewpoint. This viewpoint neglects the potential advantages some uses of animals may have for both people and animals.

A non-anthropocentric attitude, on the other hand, should recognize the due to the increasing of every living thing, whether or not they are aware. The biocentric viewpoint, which argues that all living things have intrinsic worth that should be valued, acts as an example of this point of view. This point of view is useful because it acknowledges that all living things have a right to exist and grow.

Application to Everyday Life:

The animal rights perspective, that rejects all human use of animals, can cause issues in daily living. For example, major improvements in human health have resulted from animal use in medical research. In these situations, it's crucial to make sure that animals are handled with respect and dignity. The biocentric perspective, which recognizes the objective value of all living things, can guide us in treating animals and the environment with greater respect and consideration in our daily lives.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, gaining a thorough understanding of animal philosophy requires understanding the differences between anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric perspectives. While avoiding a full rejection of all uses of animals, a non-anthropocentric viewpoint should acknowledge the importance of all living things. We may work to create a more just and compassionate society for all living things by applying these ideas into our daily lives.